My background
I have worked with children with autism for the last eight years. In 2007 I started working in an independent school which catered for students with autism and profound learning difficulties. As a Deputy responsible for Communication my great challenge was to explore which communication systems we should be using for each of our students depending on their particular level of development and individual needs.
I was very familiar with the use of different visual approaches to support communication and understanding but I was still very sceptical about some of these as my previous experience had showed me that some students made very little progress with these systems and that, although people with autism tend to benefit from visual structured systems, some of the systems that are commonly used in many educational settings do not seem to help students make sense of their environment and become independent learners.
My challenge
I was therefore using a combination of communication systems for our students, based on my previous experience working with people with autism and in collaboration with members of the education and care team. Some strategies that we implemented were effective and did help students but I always had these questions in my mind:
- Can we help students communicate better?
- Are we getting these communication systems right?
- Should it always be a case of trial and error?
- Is there any tool in the market that gives us evidence in which we can base our programmes?
The work with some professionals was also difficult at times as, without formal assessments being used, some challenged the recommendations made. Why would my recommendations about communication be better than their own ideas? What were my programmes based on? As a Speech and Language Therapist I needed an instrument that could be used with these students who were either non verbal or had very limited verbal communication and for whom the majority of the assessments tools in the market were not appropriate.
The ComFor
In 2008 Professor Rita Jordan visited the school. This was a fantastic opportunity for me to discuss the nature of our students and their communication needs with a specialist on the field. Her advice was that I should do some research on the work that Professors I. Noens and I. van Berckelaer-Onnes were doing at Leuven.
I was so pleased I might had found the answers I was looking for that soon after my meeting with Professor Rita Jordan and having discussed the issue with the Centre Director of the school, Mr. Guy Olivier, I eagerly started doing some research on the internet and found out that Professor I. Noens and I. van Berckelaer-Onnes were using an instrument called ComFor that had been developed at the Catholic University of Leuven.
The ComFor (Forerunners in Communication) is an instrument to explore underlying competence for augmentative communication. It is suitable for children and adults with a developmental level between 12 and 60 months and who have very little or not verbal communication at all. (I. Noens, I. van Berckelaer-Onnes, R. Verpoorten & G. Van Duijn, 2006).
In order to administer the ComFor you must be a Psychologist, Psycholinguistic or a Speech and Language Therapist and must have undertaken the compulsory training. In January 2009 I travelled to Leuven and did a three day training course on the ComFor at the Catholic University of Leuven.
This training has been one of the best courses I have done recently, if not the best. The ComFor was exactly the tool I was looking for and it has enabled me to assess all students in the school and base my recommendations on data and evidence, rather than on my own “instinct”.
The training I undertook gave me the skills to use the tool effectively but also, after completion of some case studies which I am planning to publish shortly I am now qualified to deliver training to other professionals who are interested in this unique clinical tool.
So why do I think the ComFor is so unique?
First of all and as mentioned above, the ComFor provides us practitioners with the data we need to make informed decisions and plan appropriate programmes of intervention.
The administration of the ComFor is highly structured and very suitable for students with autism. I have personally found out that even students whose behaviour can be very challenging at times and who find it hard to focus on formal and not very motivating tasks, tend to respond very well to the structure and repetitive nature of all the items of the ComFor.
Although it depends on individual students, it is normally possible and in fact recommended to administer the ComFor in one session only.
The interpretation of the results provides with data to make informed decisions about two important issues (Verpoorten, R., Noens, I., van Berckelaer-Onnes, I, 2008):
- Which are the most suitable means to augment that particular person’s communication?
- At which level of sense-making can the means chosen be offered?
I have written reports for all the students that I have assessed using the ComFor and found their performance during the test and their data very useful to write intervention programmes. I still find using the ComFor fascinating and findings about students still challenge my own thinking at times and also the preconceived ideas of other professionals involved in the education and/or care of students. This tool helps me reflect on students’ communication, it helps me understand their behaviour and it helps me put appropriate strategies in place to help them communicate and function better in a world that, without that support would be very confusing and unstructured for them.
In general teachers have responded very well to the new recommendations and individualised programmes for all students. The fact that we are now basing those on evidence and that I video record the administration of the test so that we can together analyse students’ performance has been very useful for all of us.
We have changed practice and… let’s admit it, changes can be very hard for people without autism! But it is exciting feeling that we are on the right track and that if our non verbal students could talk, some of them might be saying “Thanks. You are starting to get it right finally!”.
My future plans
In September 2009 I took a new job in a mainstream school. I continue to work with a small caseload of students with autism, but these are children with high functioning autism or Asperger.
However, I am still committed to help all students communicate better by using the appropriate strategies. In addition to my permanent job at the school, I am offering my consultancy services to parents/carers and schools of children with autism and/or severe and profound learning difficulties. I also provide support to professionals who are interested in using the ComFor.
Please, do not hesitate to contact me if you need further information.


0